Why do they do that?

From my office windows, I can watch the annual migration of boats in the ICW, 90% plus are powerboats. But – every day and twice on weekends, I see ‘cruising’ sailboats outfitted with all of the ‘stuff you must have’.

Aaaarggghh!!

Now, I’m only speaking of those items that may be noted from outside the vessels, not what has been installed in the non-visible locations. Those items for comfort and safety which the cruiser simply must have if they are to enjoy that lifetime dream of sailing over the horizon to some far distant exotic paradise. Well, at least that is the way those items have been sold to the boat owner and his/her partner in the adventure.

First and perhaps the biggest faux-pas in my estimation anyway, are dinghy davits on boats less than about 60 ft LOA. I have seen them on boats between 30 and 35 ft long. Sure, the davits do provide a convenient way to carry the required dinghy, required if the cruiser actually anchors out although most seem to stay in marinas. Almost always the dinghy being carried is an inflatable type, some with rigid bottoms but many without. What’s so hard about deflating the bloody thing and lashing it on deck until needed?

MY primary objections to davits on smaller boats are safety related:
ONE) On many of the boats when the dinghy is hoisted and secured for motoring along, it obscures the crew’s vision sternwards, so in the ICW such boats are often surprised when that obnoxious pro-skipper delivering a sportfish comes blasting up to the stern.
TWO) The weight of the davits, dinghy and dinghy motor depresses the stern of the vessel affecting the handling under power.
THREE) and most important if the small cruising sailboat with davits does go out into the ocean. The davits with dinghy and motor secured, substantially raises the centre of gravity of the craft which decreases the VAS as it is known by a few folks who read geeky papers. VAS = Vanishing Angle of Stability, also known as the Angle of Positive Stability or the Oh, my gawd!, the mast is in the water. We’re all going to die!! heel angle.

Here’s a shot that shows some of the problems one will encounter when sailing with a dinghy in the davits.

boat with davits

The photo shows another of my pet peeves – lots of fuel jugs on deck. If the owners of the boat in question are using the fuel containers properly, we see three gasoline (red) and one diesel (yellow). I have seen boats less than 35 ft LOA with 12 of these 5 gallon containers on deck. Does not make it easy to move from the cockpit to the foredeck. Each of the fuel jugs when full will weigh between 30 and 35 lbs. Add ’em up and then think about how much weight that is, located several feet above the CG and the centre of flotation – whoops, the WAGTD! angle is even worse

Now add in a bicycle or two, four or more fenders and one has to wonder what the folks onboard such a craft do when they come into the dock or try to pick up a mooring on a breezy day, much less how it affects the boat’s motion at sea.

Finally, on my list of things you should do without if you want to actually sail across blue water safely, full cockpit enclosures. WTF? If you have one of these on your boat, I must ask why you didn’t buy a powerboat, you know, a nice Grand Banks or similar? The first time I saw such a contrivance was a boat on Lake Ontario. Could not believe what I was seeing because you couldn’t sail when all of the curtains were up, the crew could not trim sails because they were unable to swing the jibsheet winch handles in a full circle and nobody in the cockpit could see the main at all and only the bottom portion of the headsail. Sitting in the bar at the National YC, I asked a friend what the hell the owner of such a structure was thinking about to have it installed. “Black flies” was the answer. I in my freshwater cluelessness, answered, “Whaaa?”

In Georgian Bay and the North Channel, beautiful cruising grounds by the way, the local insects just love to feast on humans so the local sailors countered with full screen cockpit enclosures, kind of like a screen porch on your old country house. So, when I see one of these boats passing by, 9 times out of 10, it will be flying a Canadian flag or its homeport will be in Michigan.

UPDATE: (sort of )
reading thru my browser bookmarks recently and came upon an article written by Jon Eisberg for Cruising World in Sept, 2004. The following paragraph is rather obviously relevant to what I have posted here.

To a very real extent, the ICW is increasingly defining how many East Coast sailors are going off cruising. Most of the ICW boats I see are better performers under power than under sail. Maximizing a cruising boat for 1,000 miles of motoring cramps its sailing style and fortifies habits that sailors carry well beyond the ICW. Many ICW boats have decks awash in gear that inhibits on-deck movement; monstrous S.U.V.-dinghies swing from arch/davit configurations that appear to defy gravity. To actually sail some of these vessels would barely be worth the effort.

Jon Eisberg has run the ICW more than 200 times. He divides his income-making days between car racing photography and yacht deliveries on the East Coast of the US. His non-income producing days are spent on his Allied Chance 30-30, Chancy.

Laura Dekker found in Sint Maarten

UPDATE: St Maarten Island Time.com 21 December 2009 16:39

PHILIPSBURG – Laura Dekker, a well known 14 year old Dutch sailor that went missing and was discovered on St. Maarten, was flown to Curacao on Monday morning.

She travelled to Curacao on board a InSel Air flight after which she boarded a KLM flight, headed for Holland.

When quizzed about the reason for her decision to travel to St. Maarten, the young sailor who is now in the custody of the Dutch Child Protection Agency, stated that she would just like to travel around the world.

from the Radio Netherlands website

Laura Dekker, the 14-year-old Dutch girl who caught the world’s attention with her plans to sail solo around the world at the end of last summer, has been found in Sint Maarten in the Netherlands Antilles. She went missing on Friday.

She was detained after police recognized her from an international alert photograph. Police have refused to say how she is or how arrived on the island but did say that every effort was being made to return the girl to Netherlands and her family as soon as possible.

Maybe the Dutch weather had gotten to her and she just wanted a holiday in the sunny Caribbean.

Tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico

USCG searchers found one of four men reported overdue after a fishing trip into the Gulf of Mexico. The four were two NFL players and two college football friends.

NFL players still missing after boat found

Schuyler clings to the engine of capsized boat
FoxNews photo 2009/03/02

CLEARWATER, Fla. – A missing man found clinging to an overturned boat was rescued Monday off Florida’s Gulf Coast, but the search continued for two NFL players and a third man aboard who didn’t return from a weekend fishing trip.

The four friends left Clearwater Pass early Saturday in calm weather, but heavy winds picked up through the day and the seas got heavy, with waves of 7 feet and higher, peaking at 15 feet on Sunday.

Just because you are good at one profession does not make you good at others. The four men went 30 miles offshore in a 21 ft center console boat on a day with a forecast that called for 25 to 30 kt winds as a cold front entered the region. The day was sunny and warm with winds of less than 10 knots, when they powered out of Clearwater Pass but they obviously didn’t bother to listen to the marine weather forecasts on their VHF.

UPDATE: 17 March 2009
Mind over Muscle

A new 23-page report from the Coast Guard (obtained by the Associated Press) sheds light on what really happened.. The sole survivor – Schuyler – says that a few hours after capsizing, one of the boaters “freaked out,” removed his life vest, and let the waves sweep him away. A few hours later, a second boater started throwing punches, took off his vest, and dove into the ocean, never to be seen again. Sometime the following day, the third man – presumably William Beakley – believed he saw land in the distance, removed his life jacket, and tried to swim for help.

The author of the quoted article has interviewed others who have survived in extreme conditions from animal attacks, car accidents to drifting for weeks in an open life boat. He is seeking answers as to why some people survive and others die when faced with threats to their lives.

His conclusions
1) Mental attitude, not physical condition
2) Acknowledgement that there are physical/mental differences in humans that can make a difference in survival
3) The right kind of optimism, not an unrealistic expectation but rather an appreciation of the situation and how best to handle it.
4) He says “Plan ahead”, I call it “Worry”, but it is the same approach, think about possible consequences of various actions. Many hours, while sailing, I have been alone on deck and would pass the time thinking (worrying) about accidents – not to depress myself but to mentally prepare myself for problems. ‘If this happens, I do this – If that happens, I do this other thing.’

The unfortunate death of the three men came about because they failed to monitor the weather, they had insufficient experience outside of the world of football. I have read more than one story of these star athletes who have been sheltered in their lives owing to their physical prowess, leading to unrealistic expectations of how they can deal with the unexpected. They were big and strong, well accustomed to physical pain, familiar with the idea that other large men were going to attack them every week of their careers but they were not aware of other types of attack. They were not aware that there is no referee out in the ocean who’s gonna blow a whistle for a personal foul.

Mother Nature just is, accept it and realise you can’t fight her. Instead you must adapt and learn the best ways to deal with her vagaries.